![]() |
|
|
About the ExhibitsOur Objective: What We Mean By Technology: Academic Framework: In 1980, Langdon Winner argued in his essay, “Do Artifacts have Politics?” (Daedalus, 109: 121-36), that technologies and technological artifacts can be designed or arranged in such a way to create a certain political order in a community. For instance, many overpasses of Long Island Parkway were purposely designed to be too low for buses to enter the more affluent areas with public beaches and parks. Affluent white people mostly drove cars, whereas people of lower socio-economic class and racial minorities used public transportation; hence, the overpasses maintained the racial and class divide. Winner’s analysis shows that technological artifacts can embody specific forms of social order and that it is important to interrogate the social and political background behind technological developments. Extending Winner’s analysis and building on a growing body of feminist scholarship on technology, this exhibit shows that technology has gender politics (as well as racial, social-class, and ageist politics). Exhibit contributors created artworks and statements that interrogate the social order built into the development, design, arrangement, and use of particular technologies. They also ask whether technologies empower (all) women, and explore feminist positions on old and new technologies. Acknowledgement:
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||